Euthanasia and Extraordinary Support to Sustain
Life
Does the Assemblies of God have a position on euthanasia, physician-assisted
suicide, and the use of medical support to sustain life? The Assemblies of God
believes all human life is sacred, a gift from God which only He (God) has the
right to take away. Because the Bible does not specifically address the use of
medical support, there is a wide range of opinion in the Assemblies of God
concerning its use. Opinions vary about the use of doctors and medicine, since
the church believes strongly in divine healing. The spectrum of opinion ranges
from those who would never go to a doctor for any reason to those who are
doctors, or consider doctors and modern medicine as a sensible means of healthy
living, a gift of God for the well-being of all mankind. Such use of doctors and
medicine in no way diminishes the truth of supernatural divine healing. The most
common view in the Assemblies of God is a reliance on God for healing through
prayer as well as a wise use of medical intervention when it is available.
Occasionally, medical intervention includes life support.
Euthanasia. Our firm belief in the sanctity of human life is put to the
supreme test in situations where the life of elderly or comatose patients is
sustained by artificial procedures developed through medical science and
technology. But we can find no scriptural support for euthanasia (sometimes
called mercy-killing). The intentional killing of human life by deliberate act
or omission runs contrary to a belief that human life is sacred because it has
been created and given by God himself.
Though some advocates of euthanasia describe mercy-killing as an act of
kindness when it is administered to a terminally ill patient subject to great
pain and suffering, members of the Assemblies of God are generally concerned
about abuses that can result from such an open attitude toward euthanasia.
Instead of respecting the sacredness of human life, proponents of euthanasia
stress the social advantages of eliminating nonproductive citizens and avoiding
high-cost medical procedures. Believing that supernatural healing is always
possible, no matter what the medical prognosis may be, members of the Assemblies
of God are more inclined to pray for healing than to approve the taking of life,
even to avoid pain and suffering. Modern medicines that can deaden pain and make
a dying patient reasonably comfortable should negate a common fear that
anticipated pain will be so severe that suicide or euthanasia are better
alternatives.
Physician—Assisted Suicide. The action of a few doctors who blatantly
violate legal restrictions as well as ethical and moral standards by assisting
terminally ill patients who request medical help in committing suicide is of
growing concern to a church that believes strongly in the sacredness of human
life. In physician-assisted suicide, the patient performs the life-ending act by
voluntarily taking the lethal medication or poison made available by the
physician.
Such actions are not accepted within the Assemblies of God. The church makes
a clear distinction between actions which halt artificial life support and
actions which directly cause death. Whether someone else administers the
life-ending medium (homicide) or the patient takes it voluntarily (suicide), the
action actively terminates life that was given by God. We recognize it is not
easy to deal with the sufferings of terminally ill patients or of comatose
persons in a vegetative state. Faced with these difficult dilemmas, society has
become more open to aggressive steps which cause death. But abuses have become
all too common as sympathetic emotions have replaced moral principles grounded
in the Judeo-Christian ethic. The ready availability of drugs and medicines that
can delay dying or hasten death present moral issues that were never faced in
earlier days of medical care.
Use of Medical Life Support To Sustain Life. The issue of sustaining life by
medical technology is complicated by uncertainty as to when death actually
occurs. Is it when breathing ceases, the heart stops beating, or brain activity
is no longer evident? Medical support can keep a body breathing after meaningful
signs of human life have ceased. There are individuals who seemingly have died,
only to be resuscitated within minutes of interrupted heartbeat or breathing.
Some who have been so resuscitated and kept alive with life support have
recovered and returned to live normal lives. Others have not. Questions arise in
these instances: How long should one try to hold on to life, especially when
suffering persists and the quality of life is at question? When is our appointed
time to die?
There are times when a debilitating accident, a life-threatening illness at
an advanced age, or prolonged terminal illness without any natural hope of
recovery makes it appropriate for a patient to say, "I will leave my life
in the hands of my Lord. Do not perform any extraordinary measures to
resuscitate me or maintain my body on life support machines, for I am ready to
go home to be with my Lord" (2 Corinthians 5:1-10). Terminal patients,
however, often wait too long to express their preference that extraordinary
life-support measures not be administered. This leaves the family with a great
burden of deciding whether to allow or reject such measures. A living will
clearly declaring one's wishes in this regard can eliminate such painful
decisions for family and loved ones.
Such decisions about using life—support technology should ultimately be
made by the patient whenever possible, after prayerful consultation with a
Christian doctor and a respected spiritual leader. It is wise to consider and
decide these matters before the moment of crisis.
In critical life-and-death situations, the use or refusal of life support is
at best a difficult decision. While weighing the biblical principle of
respecting and preserving life, the Christian also takes comfort in an equal
truth of joyously accepting our appointed time to begin eternal life with Christ
after physical death. Most people in the Assemblies of God believe there is room
for either decision after prayer and careful consideration. Furthermore, what is
right for one individual choosing life support may not be right for another.
Instead, the Christian, recognizing that the decision ultimately lies with God,
seeks prayerfully to find what God's will is in a specific situation.
Taken from the Assemblies of God
"beliefs" section on their website.
|